检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第3期21-25,共5页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(2009JJD820004)
摘 要:被害人承诺在大陆法系国家刑法中通常作为损害行为的违法阻却事由之一,它因法益的欠缺而使其获得了存在的根据。近年来,将被害人承诺的效力从阻却违法层次提前到阻却构成要件该当层次的"一元论"在大陆法系国家盛行。从中国刑法的罪刑法定原则、犯罪构成和刑法分则三个角度考察,被害人承诺在中国刑法中难以找到存在的根据。对此,应当在体系性评价的基础上,改良或变革我国刑法中的犯罪构成理论。It is usually recognized by the civil law countries that the consent of the victim is one of the reasons to remove illegality. The legitimacy of the consent of the victim comes from the lack of interests of criminal law. In the recent years, there is a mainstream view that the consent of the victim was regarded as elements of a crime which used to consider as one of the reasons to remove illegality. From the perspective of principle of legality, constitution of a crime and specific provisions of criminal law, we find the consent of the victim does not exist in our criminal law. In order to solve this problem,we should improve or change our theory of constitution of a crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15