肝病生存质量量表中文版的信度、效度测试  

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire(LDQOL 1.0)

作　　者：齐明华[1,2] 黄海[3] 董娇璇 郝元涛[5] 周元平[1] 

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学南方医院感染内科,广东省广州市510000 [2]北京大学深圳医院感染性疾病科,广东省深圳市518036 [3]汕头大学医学院临床医学系,广东省汕头市515000 [4]安徽医科大学临床医学系,安徽省合肥市230000 [5]中山大学公共卫生学院医学统计与流行病学系,广东省广州市510000

出　　处：《世界华人消化杂志》2015年第12期1973-1979,共7页World Chinese Journal of Digestology

基　　金：深圳市知识创新计划重点基金资助项目;No.JCYJ20120831144704365~~

摘　　要：目的:为了评估肝病的生存质量量表(Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire.LDQOL)1.0中文版的信度、效度。方法:采用横断面的研究,使用北京大学深圳医院的中国人病例,通过记录量表的完成率、完成量表的时间和未完成问题的维度所占的比例来考察LDQOL 1.0中文版的可行性;通过测试内在一致性(Cronbach's alpha)来检测LDQOL 1.0中文版的信度,同时也计算出各个维度的天花板效应和地板效应;通过计算LDQOL 1.0中文版的疾病特异性-12个维度与SF-36的8个维度之间的相关系数,来考察LDQOL 1.0中文版的效度.结果:总共有48例肝病患者纳入统计分析.平均年龄是39.3岁±2.6岁,75%是男性患者.完成量表的平均时间是33.5 min±12.2 min.性功能和性功能障碍这两个维度在未完成问题的比例中占有最大的比重,在LDQOL1.0中文版的疾病特异性-12个维度中,仅有1个维度的天花板效应是超过20%的,除了6个维度,其余维度的Cronbach's alpha系数均>0.70.LDQOL 1.0中文版的疾病特异性-12个维度与SF-36的8个维度之间的相关系数基本验证了假设.结论:LDQOL 1.0中文版具有较好的信度和效度.AIM： To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire （LDQOL 1.0） METHODS： This was an observational, cross- sectional study in Chinese patients from Beijing University Shenzhen Hospital. Feasibility was assessed by analyzing administration times and missing responses. Ceiling and flooring effects were calculated and reliability was tested by examining internal consistency （Cronbach＇s alpha）. Convergent validity was tested by examining correlations between LDQOL disease specific and Short Form health survey with 36 questions （SF-36） dimensions. RESULTS： A total of 48 patients were included for analysis. Mean age was 39.3 years and 73% of the sample were male. Mean time to complete questionnaire was 35.8 min ±12.2 min. Missing responses were highest on the dimensions of sexual functioning. Ceiling effects were over 20% on 1 of the LDQOL＇s 12 disease-specific scales. Cronbach＇s alpha coefficients were over 0.70 on all but 6 dimensions. Correlations between SF-36 and LDQOL disease-specific dimensions generally fulfilled the hypotheses.CONCLUSION： The Chinese version of the LDQOL 1.0 has shown satisfactory reliability and validity.

关 键 词：肝病 生存质量 量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R575[医药卫生—消化系统]