证明责任内涵的重新定位  

Redefining the Concepts of Burden of Proof

作　　者：白迎春[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古民族大学,内蒙古通辽028000

出　　处：《河北法学》2015年第6期174-180,共7页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：内蒙古民族大学博士启动基金项目<侵权诉讼中的举证责任分配>哲学社会科学(BS270)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在证明责任论中,证明责任的概念是基础中的基础。证明责任论从"严禁入内"的动荡年代到"备受关注"的兴起时代,走过了艰难的路程。然而,学术研究中的证明责任概念还没有得到十分明确,目前已经出现证明责任论研究较少的现象。证明责任中隐含很多相对独立的概念,这些概念的模糊性已经影响证明责任论的长足发展,更是严重影响司法审判的公正性。通过对证明责任的本质、意义与作用的分析与研究,把隐含在证明责任概念中的所有的独立现象逐一明确并在诉讼中重新定位。The concept of burden of proof is the basic essence of The Burden of Proof. The Burden of Proof has traveled a tough road from the ＂ no entry＂ age of turbulence to the ＂closely concerned＂ era of rising. However, the concept of ＂burden of proof＂ has not yet been clearly defined in academic research. But now The Burden of Proof has seen a depression. The burden of proof include many relatively independent concepts, but the ambiguity of which has already impacted the long-run development of the The Burden of Proof and seriously damaged judicial justice. This thesis will confirm all independent phenomena hidden in the concept of burden of proof one by one and redefine them in judicial proceedings by analyzing and studying the nature, meanings and effects of the burden of proof.

关 键 词：证明责任 举证责任 证明责任规范 证明责任分配 证明责任分配基准 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]