检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东华大学服装.艺术设计学院 [2]现代服装设计与技术教育部重点实验室(东华大学)
出 处:《国际纺织导报》2015年第3期64-64,66-68,70-72,共7页Melliand China
摘 要:着装运动舒适性是功能服装设计研发评价中的重要内容之一。通过回顾国内外相关研究,归纳总结了目前着装运动舒适性研究中常用的测评方法和手段,并从仪器误差、操作人员误差、受试者误差等角度入手,运用客观和主观评价方法,分析了不同测评方法的优缺点及实施要点,结果表明:客观试验在数据的稳定性和可重复性上相对较高,但受人工测量误差、个体生理差异等因素影响;主观试验因受试者个体认知差异的影响会导致评价标准不一致,并由此会引起结果的可靠性问题。因此,在进行试验设计时应加以针对性地改进,尽量提高试验结果的有效性,同时综合分析不同试验的结果,以获得全面、恰当、准确的评价结论。Wearing comfort of clothing in body movement had become one of the essential parts of functional clothing development and evaluation. By reviewing the recent researches,the methods commonly used in wearing comfort evaluation were summarized,and the advantages and disadvantages of subjective and objective evaluation methods were analyzed,including instruments' errors,operators' errors and subjects' difference,and concluded that the objective methods could contribute to relatively stable data and higher repeatability,but which would be influenced by operators' and subjects' diversity; while the lower reliability of the subjective methods would be due to the different evaluation standards between the participants. Therefore,much more attention should be paid on the planning of the testing protocol to guarantee the experiment effectiveness.Furthermore,combining the results of the objective and subjective tests reasonably were also important to obtain effective and reliable conclusion for the wearing comfort evaluation of clothing.
分 类 号:TS941.79[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249