应收账款质权效力考察  

Investigation on the Effect of Accounts Receivable Pledge

作　　者：许建伟[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]云南民族大学法学院,昆明650031 [2]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《大理学院学报（综合版）》2015年第5期64-70,共7页Journal of Dali University

基　　金：云南民族大学科研基金青年项目(11QN11)

摘　　要：我国《物权法》明确规定应收账款可以作为权利质权的标的,使得在应收账款债权之上设定质权获得了法律的肯认。但是,物权法关于应收账款质押以及应收账款质权的规定较为简略,无法为应收账款质押的实际操作提供可靠的法律保障,并使得该制度的实践运用面临困难。鉴于应收账款质权在效力方面具有不同于其他权利质权的特殊内容,《物权法》有必要对应收账款质权的效力问题作出专门规定,以清晰界定应收账款质权的效力内涵,并对质权人的权利给予充足的法律保障。The Real Right Law of People＇s Republic of China explicitly stipulates that the accounts receivables can be used as the subject of pledge. However, the law has only made the simple stipulation to accounts receivable pledge. Therefore, a reliable legal protection can＇t be provided to the the actual operation of accounts receivable pledge, and the using of the system will face difficulties. In view of the effect of accounts receivable pledge contain special content, which other kind of pledge does not include, The Real Right Law of People＇s Republic of China is necessary to make special provisions about the effect of accounts receivable pledge, in order to clearly define the connotation of the effect and give adequate legal protection on the rights of the pledge.

关 键 词：应收账款 应收账款质权 物权效力 《物权法》 

分 类 号：D923.3[政治法律—民商法学]