检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜新建[1]
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学产业发展研究院,江苏南京210046
出 处:《广西财经学院学报》2015年第3期9-14,27,共7页Journal of Guangxi University of Finance and Economics
基 金:教育部人文社科项目"经济理论体系融合创新研究"(12YJA790010)
摘 要:近年来,随着国有企业战略性调整的开展,针对新国企效率的讨论再度升温。对于新国企效率,不同的分析角度往往得出不同的结论。具体来看,以全要素生产率衡量的国有企业技术效率提升显著,但与其他所有制企业的横向比较的研究结果存在分歧;对于新国企的经营效率变化存在有效、无效、悖论三种观点,其成因分析主要从垄断、政府补助等因素展开;以资源配置效率衡量的资源配置有效性同样存在分歧,针对新国企的研究侧重横向比较和全局分析,"双重效率损失"与预算软约束是问题的焦点;综合效率评价考虑了国有企业的社会效率,一致认为国有企业的综合效率是有效的。In recent years,along with the strategic adjustment of state-owned enterprises the efficiency new state-owned enterprises (SOE)has been heatedly discussed again. For the new SOEs,different analytical perspectives often come to different conclusions. Specifically,the SOEs applying the measurement of the total factor productivity have a significant rise in technical efficiency,but the study results are different from the study of other ownership enterprises by horizontal comparison. Therefore,people hold three views on the op- crating efficiency changes in new SOEs,considering it valid,invalid or a paradox. The analysis mainly involve monopolies,government subsidies and other factors. As to the effectiveness of resource configuration measured by the allocation efficiency,there exist the similar differences. The studies of new SOEs have been carried out by means of the global analysis and horizontal comparison,which mainly focus on "the double efficiency loss" and soft budget constraint (SBC). The comprehensive evaluation of the efficiency of SOE,on the other hand,takes the social efficiency into account,and agrees that the overall efficiency of SOE is effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112