关于“民国文学”与学术伦理意愿的思考  

Some Reflections upon “Republic Literature” and Academic Ethics

作　　者：贾振勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2015年第3期59-65,共7页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：有关"民国文学研究"的相关讨论,既存在表达不周和误读问题,也存在共同的话语基础。民国文学研究的学术动机和理想,既是为了寻求中国文学研究的发展与创新,也是为了继承"学术乃天下之公器"的人文理想。"民国文学史"等观念的主要学术对象,乃民国的文学和文学的民国,而不是政治的民国和趣味的民国;国民党既是"民国机制"的主要推手之一,也是"民国机制"的第一掘墓人。民国文学是在一个与中国古典文学和世界文学对话的共存秩序中,实现了自我本质的确证,为中国文艺复兴初步打开了开放之门和创造之门,此乃"民国文学研究"最坚实的动力源。Common discourse grounds other than improper expressions and even misinterpretation ex- ist in the discussions related to ＂Republic literature study. ＂ The academic motivation and ideal of Re- public literature study is not only to seek for development and innovation of Chinese literature study but also to inherit the humane ideal that ＂Academics is the universal common tool. ＂ The major aca- demic connotation of the notions including ＂history of Republic literature＂ is the literature in the Re- public of China and the Republic of China of such literature, but not the political entity of the Repub- lic of China or one of certain tastes. The Kuomintang is not only one of the main drivers for ＂Republic mechanism,＂ but also its primary gravedigger. Republic literature has achieved its self identity in co- existing and conversing with Chinese classic renaissance. This is the most solid motivation erature and world literature; i for ＂Republic literature study t initiates China＇ erary

关 键 词：民国文学 学术伦理 学术理想 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]