医学期刊基金论文比与影响因子等指标的关系及影响因素  

The relationship and influencing factors of medical journals' funding ratio,impact factor,and other evaluation indexes

作　　者：王谦[1] 林萍[1] 孙昌朋[2] 陈望忠[2] 

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学人文与管理学院 [2]<南方医科大学学报>编辑部

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2015年第6期634-638,共5页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

摘　　要：【目的】分析医学期刊基金论文比与影响因子等指标的相关关系。【方法】选取2011年版《中文核心期刊要目总览》中数量最多的6类医学期刊(共152种)为研究对象,以2011-2014年版《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》为数据来源,将两年基金论文比和影响因子等指标作为分析对象,进行Spearman相关分析。【结果】该6类期刊的两年基金论文比与影响因子并无显著相关性(P值均大于0.05)。基金论文比与其他期刊评价指标也不完全有相关性。【结论】基金论文比不适合作为国内期刊评价的重要指标,办刊人和期刊评价体系应该科学理性地看待基金论文比。[Purpose] This paper aims at analyzing the relationship between medical journals＇ funding ratio,impact factor,and other evaluation indexes.[Methodology] The largest number of medical journals in six categories were selected as the object of this study.Based on 2011-2014 Chinese Scientific and Technical Journal Citation Report （core version） for data sources.This study took two years funding ratio and impact factor,and other evaluation indexes as analysis indicators for Spearman correlation.[Findings] There is no significant correlation of the six kinds of journals＇ two years funding ratio and impact factor（p ＞ 0.05）,funding ratio and other evaluation indexes are not completely correlated.[Conclusions] Funding ratio is not suitable as an important indicator of the domestic journal evaluation.We＇d better take it into account rationally.

关 键 词：医学期刊 基金论文比 影响因子 客观因素 人为因素 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] R-5[医药卫生]