“站票坐票同价销售”背后的法学思考——兼评“丁昌祥诉北京铁路局无座车票价格案”  

Legal Consideration of “Standing Ticket and Sit Ticket Same Price Sale”

作　　者：李亮辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]中原工学院,郑州450007

出　　处：《中原工学院学报》2015年第2期78-80,107,共4页Journal of Zhongyuan University of Technology

摘　　要：据不完全统计,从1998年葛锐诉郑州铁路分局至今10余年,铁路部门因公益诉讼站在被告席的次数已不少于10次。这些诉讼在一定程度上推动了中国法治建设的进程。但深究诉讼中原、被告博弈的过程,其中折射出的经济学、社会学及法学问题不容小觑。随着我国改革的全面深化,培育法治信仰、优化法治环境,方能实现法治"中国梦"、促进经济社会和谐发展。Gerui vs Zhengzhou Railway Bureau from 1998 to date, more than 10 years, according to in- complete statistics, the number of public interest litigation for railway department stood on the clock has not less than ten times. These lawsuits in a certain extent promoted the process of the construction of the rule of law in China, but digging into the central plains, the game process, which reflects the problems of economics, sociology and law, is worth further exploration. With the deepening of China＇s reform and comprehensive, nurturing faith in the rule of law, and optimizing the legal environment in order to achieve the rule of law, ＂China Dream＂, to promote the harmonious development of economy and society.

关 键 词：垄断行业 竞争法 正义 权利 

分 类 号：D915.4[政治法律—诉讼法学]