论不纯正不作为与作为犯罪的界分  

Distinction between Act and Non-typical Omission

作　　者：唐子艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学文法学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期458-463,共6页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：不纯正不作为在一定程度上突破了犯罪的范围,拓展了犯罪圈,使得对相关危害行为的定性更为合理。在区分作为和不纯正不作为的时候,必须将行为的个数予以明确,不能将几个行为作为一个行为来判断和评价;必须明确行为不同的社会意义,并以此来区分作为和不纯正不作为;要区分作为和不纯正不作为行为必须找到需要法律评价的部分,而不能将法律并不予评价的内容也纳入区分的范围;区分作为和不纯正不作为要围绕法益的保护进行。Non-typical omission is a breakthrough to some extent. It extends the scope of the crime,and expands the circle of crime, which makes the qualitative determination of the relevant behavior more reasonable.To make the distinction between acts and omlsstons,we must be clear about tne numoer of behaviors.A few behaviors cannot be judged as one and evaluated.These behaviors must be clearly dif- ferent from the view of social significance for distinguishing acts and omissions.To distinguish between acts and omissions,we must find the necessary part of legal evaluation.The distinction between act and non-typical omission should be made on the basis of legal interests.

关 键 词：作为 不纯正不作为 双相关行为 因果流终止行为 原因自由行为 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]