不同介入法治疗80例肝癌的疗效观察  被引量:4

Curative Effect Observation of Different Interventional Therapy in Treatment of 80 Cases Liver Cancer

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:任长德 

机构地区:[1]河南省商丘市中医院,476000

出  处:《中国继续医学教育》2015年第15期87-88,共2页China Continuing Medical Education

摘  要:目的比较两种不同介入法治疗肝癌的临床疗效。方法选取我院80例肝癌患者作为研究对象,并随机分为观察组和对照组,每组均为40例。给予对照组射频消融治疗,观察组则联合肝动脉灌注栓塞化疗治疗,比较两组的临床疗效和不良反应。结果观察组的总有效率为87.50%,对照组的总有效率为65.00%,两组差异显著,P<0.05;对照组不良反应率为12.50%,观察组无不良反应,两组差异显著,P<0.05。结论射频消融联合肝动脉灌注栓塞化疗治疗肝癌,能够缓解患者病情,避免不良反应,具有良好的疗效。Objective Comparison of two different interventional therapy clinical curative effect for the treatment of liver cancer. Methods Selected from 80 patients with liver cancer as the research object, and randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases in each group are. Give control group radiofrequency ablation therapy, observation group joint hepatic artery perfusion embolism chemotherapy treatment, compared two groups of clinical curative effect and adverse reactions. Results Observation group total effective rate was 87.50%, control group total effective rate was 65.00%, significant difference was found in two groups, P〈0.05, Control the adverse reaction rate was 12.50%, the observation group has no adverse reaction, significant difference was found in two groups, P〈0.05. Conclusion Radiofrequency ablation combined hepatic artery perfusion embolism chemotherapy treatment for cancer of the liver, relieves patients, avoid adverse reaction, has the good curative effect.

关 键 词:肝癌 射频消融 肝动脉灌注栓塞 疗效 

分 类 号:R735.7[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象