检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省常熟市第一人民医院麻醉科,常熟215500
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2015年第6期637-638,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:比较彩色多普勒超声技术辅助定位下的中心静脉穿刺和传统盲探法穿刺的成功率,探讨一种较佳的深静脉临床置管技术。方法:选择2012年1月~2013年1月我院中晚期肿瘤患者100例,随机分成B、A两组:B组应用超声仪探查右颈内静脉进行辅助定位后穿刺,A组采用盲探法平行颈动脉旁穿刺。比较两种方法的穿刺成功率、失败率和并发症。结果:总成功率B组高于A组,其中B组一次穿刺成功率明显优于A组,具有统计学有意义(P〈0.05),且无并发症发生。结论:超声辅助的定位下的中心静脉置管技术,简便易行,安全可靠,成功率高,便于示教。Objective: We performed the study to compare the success rate of ultrasound(US)-assisted positioning percutaneous puncture and traditional percutaneous puncture in central venous catheterization.Methods:From January 2012 to January 2013,one hundred patients with middle or advanced cancer were randomly divided into US-assisted positioning percutaneous catheterization group(group B) and traditional percutaneous catheteration group(group A).The success rate and complication of puncture were compared.Results:The total success rate of B group was higher than that in group A,And compared with group A,group B has higher one time success rate,And B groups was statistically significant difference between groups(P〈0.05),and group B have less complications.Conclusion:Ultrasound-assisted positioning percutaneous puncture can significantly improve the success rate of central venous catheteration and decrease the occurrence of complications.The method is effective,safe and reliable,easy to teach.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117