基于历史排放参照的碳配额分配机制研究  

Quota Allocation Mechanism based on Historical Emissions of Carbon

作　　者：令狐大智[1,2] 叶飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学工商管理学院,广东广州510640 [2]广西大学商学院,广西南宁530004

出　　处：《中国管理科学》2015年第6期65-72,共8页Chinese Journal of Management Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172075;71090403);教育部高校博士点基金项目(20130172110029);教育部新世纪项目(NECT-13-0219)

摘　　要：将行业内企业按单位产品碳排放水平分为高排企业和低排企业两类,并将"共同但有区别的责任原则"引入行业内部,构建基于双寡头竞争市场的碳配额分配策略。通过建立基于分配策略的古诺模型,研究减排目标、分配策略和单位产品碳排放水平对企业的利润差、产量和碳排放的影响。研究结果表明,减排策略对单位产品碳排放水平具有较强的敏感性;当行业中的企业存在单位产品碳排放水平差异时,对低排企业宽松的碳配额分配策略具有更强的减排激励效用,利于企业主动实施低碳技术改造;阶段式递进减排机制对"共同但有区别责任原则"在行业内应用,企业低碳技术改造的激励效用以及减排政策的稳步推进有积极的作用;同时研究表明准确核实企业单位产品碳排放水平的重要性。According to the current realities of industry and the target of carbon reduction, companies are classified into two categories： high and low ranked by the carbon emission per unit item and introduce ＇the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities~. Considering history of carbon emissions and incen- tive by profit margins, a carbon quota allocation policy is present. Based on the allocation policy, a Courn- ot duopoly model is employed to study the influences on the two categories of reduction targets, quota allo- cation policy and carbon emission per unit item. The result shows that the quota allocation policy has a positive sensitivity on carbon emission per unit item; generous allocation focusing on low--ranked has a stronger incentive utility on those companies. Moreover, progressive--stage reduction mechanism has a positive effect on both incentive utility of implement a low--carbon and steady implementation of policies. The study highlights the importance of verification on the carbon emissions and also extends the perspec- tives of research and mechanism design on carbon reduction and will contributes to carbon reduction in Chi- na.

关 键 词：碳配额分配 基准排量 历史排放 双寡头竞争 

分 类 号：F272[经济管理—企业管理] O225[经济管理—国民经济]