检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西中医药大学,2013级硕士研究生南昌330006 [2]江西中医药大学附属医院,南昌330006
出 处:《江西中医药大学学报》2015年第3期55-56,72,共3页Journal of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察吊针疗法治疗面肌痉挛临床疗效。方法:60例面肌痉挛患者随机分为两组(观察组和对照组),观察组用吊针疗法治疗,对照组用常规针刺治疗,两组治疗前后及治疗结束3个疗程后根据Albert分级量表进行功能分级评分。结果:两组治疗前后Albert分级量表评分比较均有显著性意义(P<0.01),治疗后两组间比较无差异(P>0.05),但在治疗结束1个月后两组疗效比较有非常显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:吊针疗法和常规针刺疗法对面肌痉挛均有较好的治疗效果,但吊针疗法的远期疗效优于常规针刺法。Objective:To observe the curative effect of infusion therapy on hemifacial spasm.Methods: Randomly divided 60 cases of patients with hemifacial spasm of the inclusion criteria into two groups ( observation group and controled group) , infusion therapy group for the observation group, conventional acupuncture observation group as the controled group.The controled group of two, before the intervention and intervention after 3 courses of treatment, 'according to the Albert grading scale'functional grading.Results: The two groups after the intervention according to the Albert rating scale scores were significantly decreased (P〈0.001), there was no differ-ence between the two groups (P〉0.05), but at the end of the intervention of the two groups after 3 courses of Albert grading scale than has the difference (P〈0.001).Conclusion:Intravenous therapy and conventional acupuncture point selection on the intervention effect of hemifacial spasm were good, but the long-term clinical effect of transfusion therapy is better than that of routine acupuncture method.
关 键 词:吊针疗法 针刺疗法 面肌痉挛 Albert分级量表
分 类 号:R745.12[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70