法院适用刑事和解程序的实证分析  

Empirical Analysis about the Victim-Offender Reconciliation Applyed by Courts

作　　者：黄艳芳 

机构地区：[1]南宁市良庆区法院,广西南宁530219

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2015年第3期49-52,共4页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

基　　金：广西高级法院2014年度一般课题[GXGY(2014)B03(02)]"社会舆论对审判权运行影响的实证研究"阶段性成果

摘　　要：作为刑事诉讼中的特别程序,刑事和解制度在化解社会矛盾方面具备独特优势。司法实践表明,刑事和解能一体化地解决传统刑事诉讼所忽视的修复社会关系、赔偿被害人损失、减少短期自由刑适用和提高诉讼效率等问题。然而,当前刑事和解适用规模较小,司法适用上存在被告人适用程序不平等、赔偿数额不够合理、和解趋于形式化、公众误解等问题。解决这些问题,应在准确理解新刑事诉讼法对刑事和解规定的基础上,加大实践探索,不断优化制度,保障经济困难的被告人平等享有刑事和解的权力,有条件地制止漫天要价行为,构建起当事人真诚沟通、谅解的平台,并厘清社会公众对刑事和解的误解。As a special procedure in criminal proceedings, Victim-Offender Reconciliation has its unique advantages in terms of resolving social contradictions. Judicial practice shows that the Victim-Offender Reconciliation can solve problems ignored by the traditional criminal procedures such as repairing the social relations damaged by crime, compensating the victims, reducing shortterm imprisonment, improving the efficiency of lawsuit and so on. However, the applying scale of Victim-Offender Reconciliation is no large enough yet. Problems like unequal application between rich and poor defendants, unreasonable compensations between cases, tendency of form, and pressure of public opinion do exist in the judicial practice. To solve these problems, we should do more practice and optimize the procedure on the basis of accurate understanding of the Victim-Offender Reconciliation system in the new Criminal Procedure Law. Defendants＇ equal rights of applying the Victim-Offender Reconciliation should be guaranteed. Salting price should be constrained conditionally. It＇ s also necessary to build up the platform for parties to communicate, regret and forgive. Public misunderstanding of Victim-Offender Reconciliation should also be eliminated.

关 键 词：刑事和解 化解矛盾 花钱买刑 制度优化 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]