检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2015年第7期1057-1060,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:河南省科技厅科技发展计划项目(编号:112102310446)
摘 要:目的:探讨团体辅导对流动儿童焦虑情绪改善的作用。方法:筛选出56名焦虑评分较高的郑州市流动儿童,按照自愿原则,分成两组:26例接受为期8周、共计8次的团体辅导,作为研究组;30例为对照组,研究期间不接受任何心理干预。所有受试者在研究前及结束后分别接受儿童焦虑情绪障碍筛查表、简易应对方式量表测查。结果:1经过8次团体辅导干预后,研究组在广泛性焦虑因子上得分明显低于对照组得分,差异具有统计学意义(t=-2.017,P<0.05);在躯体化/惊恐因子上,研究组得分低于对照组得分,差异具有显著的统计学意义(t=-4.389,P<0.01);在分离性焦虑因子上研究组得分低于对照组得分,差异具有显著的统计学意义(t=-3.690,P<0.01);2经过8次团体辅导干预后,研究组的积极应对方式得分高于对照组得分,差异具有显著的统计学意义(t=3.149,P<0.01)。结论:团体辅导能有效改善流动儿童的焦虑情绪,促进其积极应对压力。Objective: To explore the importance of group therapy for anxiety emotions in migrant children. Methods: 56 migrant children were assigned into two groups. In study group, 26 migrant chil- dren were accepted group therapy for 8 times. In control study,30 migrant children were accepted no ther- apy. All subjects were accepted the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders, Simplified Cop- ing Style Questionnaire before and after study. Results: (1)The score of generalized anxiety in study group were lower than that in control group after group therapy( t = -2. 017, P 〈 0.05 ). The score of somatic/ panic in study group was lower than that in control group after group therapy( t =-4. 389, P 〈 0.01 ). The score of separation anxiety in study group was lower than that in control group after group therapy (t = -3. 690,P 〈0.01 ). (2)The score of positive coping style in study group was higher than that in control group after group therapy( t = 3. 149 ,P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion:Group therapy is a good method for migrant children to improve anxiety emotion and positively cope stress.
关 键 词:流动儿童 焦虑情绪 分离性焦虑 团体辅导 应对方式
分 类 号:R395.5[哲学宗教—心理学] B844.1[医药卫生—医学心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112