检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院经济研究所,北京100836 [2]中国社会科学院研究生院,北京100836
出 处:《改革》2015年第6期64-72,共9页Reform
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"寻找企业边界的均衡点--规模与效率"(批准号:71172225)
摘 要:为考察市场上是否存在阻碍竞争的垄断壁垒,使用国家统计局规模以上工业企业数据库,对制造业的全部三位数行业的各所有制企业的成本函数进行估计,分别作出158幅分行业所有制分组的平均成本比较图。结果显示,大多数行业的国企平均成本曲线稳定地高于其他企业,表明在国企与民企之间,不是偶然或随机的,而是系统地普遍存在着一种逆市场行为,这意味着存在着某种超市场的垄断力量,形成了一种制度壁垒分割下的垄断市场。以政府为主导的发展模式实质上是通过国企的垄断力量来推行的,它导致低效率的资源配置,也与市场化发展目标相悖。促进竞争、反对垄断和优化资源配置可以大大释放发展潜力,应是深化改革的关键切入点。In order to investigate if there are monopoly barriers in the market, we estimate the cost function of 3 types ownership enterprises for all 3 digital manufacture sectors, using all industrial enterprises (above certain scale) data from NSB. Based on the cost funetion, we make the average cost curves according the ownership groups to compare each others. The results show most of state enterprises average cost curves .are stably higher than others. The evidence indicate there is anti-market behavior generally between SOE and others, not occasionally or random. It means there is some forces beyond market behind SOEs, to form the monopoly market fragmented by institutional barriers. The government led-development model is actually carried by state monopoly powers or SOEs. It results in lower allocation efficiency, and also contradiction with our market economy target. Therefore it is the key of deepening reforms to release the growth potential by promoting competition and anti-monopoly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70