检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵颖[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院,济南250100
出 处:《中州大学学报》2015年第3期28-32,共5页Journal of Zhongzhou University
摘 要:审级制度的确立总是与一国的社会、历史、经济乃至政治因素相联系,对于我国两审终审制的全面认知有赖于对审级制度本身功能的准确定位。通过对域外国家审级制度的比较研究发现我国制度设计及实际运作的不足,而在我国两审终审制的结构设计中并未将理想审级制度应该具有的功能完全展现。结合我国司法改革的实际,审级制度的改革完善也应循序渐进,分近期目标、远期目标的两步走方略更为合理,以体现司法改革的渐进性。The establishment of trial grade system is always linked with one country's social,historical,economic situation,even political factors,and the comprehensive knowledge about our country's trial grade system depends on the system's accurate positioning. It is regarded as a rational choice to discover the shortage of our country's system design and actual operation through the comparative study. However,the present two- final trial system hasn't shown the ideal trial grade system's function completely. Considering the reality about our judicial reform,the reforming and improvement of trial grade system should correspond to its ideal function in a gradual way.And it is more reasonable to divide two steps to reflect the gradual reform of the judicial system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7