三种眼压计测量眼压的对比研究  

Comparative study on the intraocular pressure measurement with three tonometer

作　　者：马贵娥 胡颖[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院眼科,100730

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2015年第16期1230-1232,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

摘　　要：目的比较分析ICARE回弹式眼压计（RBT）、压平式眼压计（AT）、非接触眼压计（NCT）测量结果，探讨ICARERBT的临床性能。方法选择2014年5～11月在北京同仁医院眼压监测室接受昼夜眼压曲线测量的可疑青光眼患者100例（100只眼），同时用RBT、AT、NCT分别由2名检查者进行眼压测量，每种眼压计的测量均重复3次，分别记录并计算平均数作为该种眼压计的测量结果。结果RBT、AT、NCT测得眼压值分别为（19．1±5．7）、（18．9±5．0）mmHg（1mmHg=0．133kPa）和（15．2±5．0）mmHg，RBT与AT的差值平均为（Q2±1．8）mmHg，NCT与AT的差值平均为-（3．8±2．6）mmHg。RBT与AT所测值的差异无统计学意义，t=-1．136，P〉0．05，NCT与AT所测值的差异有统计学意义，t=14．714，P〈0．01。RBT、NCT与AT所测值间均有显著相关性，r=0．948、0．822，均P〈0．01。RBT不同测量者内相关系数在0．973，与AT的结果接近。结论RBT可以在临床上运用，且应用范围广泛。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of ICARE rebounder tonometer （RBT） by comparing the measurement results of ICARE RBT, applanation tonometer （AT） and non-contact tonometer （NCT）. Methods This study included 100 glaucoma suspect cases （100 eyes） with their day and night intraocular pressure （IOP） measurement in Beijing Tongren Hospital from May to November,2014. IOP of each eye was measured by two experienced examiners using RBT,AT and NCT for three times respectively and the mean values were recorded as the final result. Results IOP was measured by RBT, AT, NCT, the values were （19.1±5.7）, （18.9±5.0）, （15.2±5.0） mmHg （1 mmHg=0.133 kPa）, respectively. The difference between RBT and AT was （0.2±1.8） mmHg,and the difference between NCT and AT was -（3.8±2.6） mmHg. There was no significant difference in the values between RBT and AT, t=-1.136, P〉0.05. There was significant difference in the values between NCT and AT, t=14.714,P〈0.01. The results measured by RBT, NCT and AT had correlation, r=0.948, 0.822; P〈0.01.The relevant value was 0.973 in two examiners with RBT, which consisted with the result with AT. Conclusion RBT meets the clinical needs and can be widely used in clinical work.

关 键 词：眼内压 眼压测量法 眼压计 

分 类 号：R770.4[医药卫生—眼科]