加拿大意见规则的考察基点  

Inspection Points and Standards of Opinions Rules in Canada

作　　者：李峣[1] 吴三军 

机构地区：[1]北京政法职业学院,北京102628 [2]山东省成武县人民检察院,山东菏泽274000

出　　处：《河北法学》2015年第8期135-144,共10页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：北京政法职业学院2014年专项课题<法官证据裁量权的规则及对伪证的处理>的阶段性成果

摘　　要：科技的发达、专业的细化使得诉讼中对于专业性问题的涉及越来越趋向多元化,凭借专家证人制度,英美法系国家对此做出成功的应对,属于英美法系国家的加拿大,在美国的既定规则的指引下,经多年的努力,确立了意见规则的相关性、必要性、无排除事项、可靠性等标准。在此过程中,法官所需、专家独立、无污染意见的内容与形式等要求则是附加于意见规则的程序保障。The scientific development and professional refinement of technology make specialized issues involving litigation more diversified . By virtue of the expert witness system, common law countries have made successful response, one of common law countries, Canada ,under the guidance of the established rules of the United States, after years of efforts established the standards fo relevance, necessity, no exclusions, reliability. In this process, the need for judges, independent expert and non-polluted advice in content and form are the safeguards attached to the views of the rule.

关 键 词：专家证人 意见规则 客观性 相关性 可靠性 

分 类 号：DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]