解构与续造:当事人的陈述制度化构建  

Deconstruction and Reconstruction: on the Party's Statements in Civil Action

作　　者：黄宣[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《河北法学》2015年第8期155-160,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：民事诉讼中,当事人既是案件事实的亲历者,最知悉案情,又是案件事实的最大利害关系人,其陈述的证明力较弱。将如此先天性不足的当事人的陈述,列为证据种类的首位,有违立法之科学。强化当事人的陈述之制度构建,并将当事人的陈述界定为自由心证的补充性地位,是民事诉讼制度精细化的必然选择。In civil action, best, as well the party is also the facts witness of the case and knows the case as has the greatest interest with the case. However, his or her statement is still weak. If the party＇s statements with deficiency are listed as the first type of evidence, it is contrary to the legislation and not scientific. It is the best choice to elaborate the civil procedure system by strengthening the construction of the party＇s statement system and defining the statements of the party function as a supplementary role

关 键 词：陈述制度 证据种类 询问当事人 民事诉讼制度 

分 类 号：DF721[政治法律—诉讼法学]