民国时期中医的“实证科学化”——布尔迪厄实践哲学的视阈  

“Empirical Scientization”of Traditional Chinese Medicine During the Period of the Republic of China:From the Perspective of Practical Philosophy of Pierre Bourdieu

作　　者：田静[1] 蔡仲[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《医学与哲学（A）》2015年第7期92-95,共4页Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"中医文化核心价值体系及现代转型研究";项目编号:12&ZD114;国家社会科学基金重点项目"科学实践哲学与地方性知识研究";项目编号:13AZD026

摘　　要：在近代中国"科学文化"兴起的社会环境中,余云岫提出的"废止中医案"和中药的实证研究将中医的"实证科学化"推向了一个新的阶段。从布尔迪厄实践哲学的视域看,这实际上是中医在近代医学场域内运用各种策略与西医进行博弈以获取自身的生存,而当近代医学场域的结构发生改变(西医规则主导)后,中医不得不改变自己固有的习性,以谋取各种科学资本、文化资本与社会资本,去适应现代化的要求。在这一过程中,西医对中医的改造并非是单向性的,中医也对西医进行重塑。这是两种医学辩证缠绕在一起的相互重构。In the social context of emergence of ＂scientific culture＂ in modern China, ＂the ease of abolishing Traditional Chinese Medicine （TCM）＂ proposed by Yu Yun-xiu and the empirical research of Chinese medicine brought ＂empirical scientization of Chinese medicine＂ into a new stage. From the perspective of practical philosophy of Pierre Bourdieu, the authors argued that it was the game between TCM and western medicine by all kinds of strategies in modern medical field for its own survival. However, when the structure of modern medical field changes （western medicine rules dominated）, it has to change its own habits for achieving all kinds of scientific capitals, cultural capitals and social capitals in order to adapt to modern requirements. Furthermore, the authors argued that the transformation was not a one way process; TCM had reshaped the western medicine; and these two kinds of medicines dialectical are entwined mutually reconstructed.

关 键 词：中医 实证科学化 布尔迪厄 实践哲学 

分 类 号：R-092[医药卫生]