检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林楚岚[1] 江桂华[2] 刘金武[2] 李武铭[2] 颜剑豪[2] 梁联保[2] 全显跃[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学珠江医院放射科,广州市510282 [2]广东省第二人民医院影像科,广州市510317
出 处:《实用医学杂志》2015年第12期1951-1953,共3页The Journal of Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较多次屏气与呼吸触发氢质子磁共振波谱(hydrogen 1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy,1H-MRS)对肝脏脂肪含量量化的一致性和相关性。方法 :60例受试者使用1.5 T磁共振扫描仪在肝脏Ⅶ段分别行多次屏气和呼吸触发1H-MRS采集。分别记录波谱曲线中亚甲基峰和水峰下面积,计算脂肪分数。计算两者的Pearson相关系数、Bland-Altman 95%一致性界限和一致性相关系数。结果:多次屏气和呼吸触发1H-MRS得到的平均肝脏脂肪含量分别为(8.6±8.7)%和(9.4±9.3)%,两者高度相关(r=0.973,P<0.0001;一致性相关系数为0.95)。用Bland-Altman方法 ,91.7%点都在95%一致性界限内。结论 :多次屏气与呼吸触发1H-MRS均能用于量化肝脏脂肪含量。这两种方法高度相关且一致性良好。Objective To compare the consistency and correlation of multiple breath-hold (BH) with respiratory-triggered (RT) 1H-MRS for quantification of hepatic lipid content. Methods Sixty subjects were underwent RT 1H-MRS of the liver (Couinaud segment VII) and BH 1H-MRS at 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonace Imaging (MRI). The peak areas of water and methylene obtained on RT and BH 1H-MRS were recorded respectively and the liver fat fraction was calculated. Pearson correlation coefficient , Bland-Altman 95% limit of agreement, and concordance correlation coefficient were calculated. Results Mean liver fat fraction measured in RT and BH 1H-MRS were (8.6 ± 8.7)% and (9.4 ± 9.3)% respectively. There was a strong correlation between RT and BH 1H-MRS(r = 0.973, P 〈 0.000 1, concordance correlation coefficient = 0.95). With the Bland-Altman method, 91.7% data points were within the 95% limits of agreement. Conclusion RT and BH 1H-MRS are alternative tools for intrahepatic lipid quantification. These two methods have a strong correlation and perfect consistency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.88.145