还儒归孔——张君劢和庞德的分歧与暗合  

Confuciamism as Confucius Had It:The Disagreement and Agreement between Zhang Junmai and Pound

作　　者：钱兆明[1] 陈礼珍[1] 

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学外国语学院,杭州浙江311121

出　　处：《中国比较文学》2015年第3期152-166,共15页Comparative Literature in China

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目<庞德与中国友人的交往研究>(编号13FWW009)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：庞德在1953年遇到中国当代新儒学大师张君劢,二人之间就"还儒归孔"的问题产生过分歧与暗合,围绕儒家思想的正统与发展等问题展开了对话。张君劢对"灵"字等儒家思想概念的解释对庞德加深理解有一定帮助,他在会谈中提及的"亦尚一人"观点被庞德直接吸收融入《诗章》之中。庞德和张君劢对儒家思想的理解有巨大分歧:庞德恪守儒家经典,想要做的是"还儒归孔",需要的仅仅是最能代表中国(东方)文化智慧的某些最经典、并且可以在最大程度上对西方文化范式产生冲击的哲学理念符号;而张君劢则依据宋明理学框架来发展孔孟之道,反对将儒学当做"博物馆藏品"来供奉,主张在新的时代和历史条件下发展儒家思想。张君劢的新儒家思想潜移默化影响了庞德,自《钻石机诗章》以后,庞德不再坚持将新儒家对孔孟之道的一切"扩容"排斥在外。Relying on published and unpublished materials, this paper traces unknown debate between Pound and Zhang Junmai （Carsun Chang） in the early I950s. Pound wanted Confucianism ＂as Confucius had it,＂ and had little interest in ＂later dilatations,＂ whereas Zhang, a leading present-day neo-Confucian, was opposed to a ＂hackneyed exposition of the basic thought of Confucius,＂ what he called a ＂museum approach.＂ Despite their disa- greement, the two men held each other in esteem, and ideas introduced by Zhang, both from traditional Confucian works and from ＂later dilatations,＂ went into Pound＇s cantos of the mid- 1950s. In the late 1950s, surprisingly, Pound opened himself to Kangxi and Yongzheng＇s Confucian ＂Sacred Edict,＂ which he would not have used without years of interactions with Zhang.

关 键 词：庞德 张君劢 《尚书》 新儒学 

分 类 号：I109.5[文学—世界文学]