无权解释的交往能力及其司法实践价值——以司法过程中无权解释与法官解释的交往关系为中心  

The Communication Ability of Academic Interpretation and Its Value on Judicial Practice——A Focus on the Relationship of Communication between Academic Interpretation and Judicial Interpretation of Judge in Judicial Process

作　　者：魏治勋[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第4期14-22,共9页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：2012年国家社科基金后期资助项目"法律解释的原理与方法体系"(12FFX016)的阶段性成果;山东大学自主创新基金项目(青年团队项目)"走向大国的中国法治:从法律体系到法治体系"(IFYT1220)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在司法场域内,有权解释作为一种体制性解释类型,在国家的法律生活中起着具体释明法律、解决法律纠纷的作用。但无权解释并非可有可无,反而经常构成有权解释的来源或助益性因素。在一定的社会条件下,无权解释能够转化为有权解释;历史上无权解释亦曾通过民众参与司法过程发挥作用;在法治社会,律师和民众的解释作为司法过程的一个构成性要素,能够对司法判决产生重大影响;尤其在疑难或复杂案件审理过程中,法官需要参照"社会命题"以达成具有合法性的司法判决。这些都展示出无权解释的交往能力及其实践价值。以判决合法性和社会效果为重要追求的现代司法审判,因之应当是一个以法官的有权解释为主导,凝聚、吸收无权解释智慧的理性商谈过程。In the course of justice,authoritative interpretation,as the type of legal interpretation within the system,is the effective interpretation issued from judges,which takes on tasks of explicating the law and resolving the dispute in social life.But academic interpretation is not trivial,petty and pointless,it can be converted into authoritative interpretation under certain social condition,or plays effective role via the populace participating in the judicial process.Even in society with rule of law,the interpretations of the populace or lawyers often exert strong influence to judicial decisions as constitutive factors.Especially in hard cases,judges must give its legitimate decision by reference to social propositions.All those add up to a perfect exhibition of the practical value and importance of communicative competence of academic interpretation.Thus we can say,modern judicatory judgment longing for legitimacy and social affections should be regarded as a rational discourse process presided by judges in order to cohere and absorb the wisdom of academic interpretation.

关 键 词：法律解释 无权解释 有权解释 交往能力 商谈理性 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]