检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西杨凌712100 [2]铜陵学院工商管理学院,安徽铜陵244000
出 处:《农林经济管理学报》2015年第3期252-258,266,共8页Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13BJY053);安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(SK2013B529)
摘 要:结合农村公共投资与城乡经济一体化的现实及其之间的内在逻辑关联,引出一个以两者为原型的社会投入与社会产出的效率问题。通过DEA模型的实证研究发现:农村公共投资作为一种稀缺社会资源投入,之所以没能得到城乡经济一体化这种社会产出的高效响应,原因并不是投资规模不足,而是耗散严重、管理效能低下。进一步以效率作为被解释对象,通过Tobit模型研究发现:农业发展壮大基础上的城镇化、工业化能有效改善农村公共投资的效率,但是以减少农业生产人口为特征的"浅城镇化"和以"消灭农业"为特征的扭曲的工业化则会损害农村公共投资的效率。Based on the reality of public investment in rural areas and urban-rural economic integration as well as their associated logic,the efficiency issue was raised. Through DEA model empirical studies,it studied why rural public investment did not get efficient response from urban-rural economic integration,with the former regarded as scarce social resources,the latter as social output. The reason consists not in the investment scale,but in low administrative efficiency. Furthermore,through a Tobit model,outside factors influencing the efficiency was studied. It was found that urbanization and industrialization based on agricultural development can improve the efficiency of public investment in rural areas,but"shallow urbanization"characterized with reducing rural population and distorted industrialization characterized with eradicating agriculture will damage it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229