检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津财经大学数学系,天津300221 [2]天津大学管理与经济学部,天津300072 [3]天津港(集团)有限公司,天津300461
出 处:《工业工程》2015年第3期42-47,共6页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(91430108);天津市高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(20132141;20122127);天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJGL13-037)
摘 要:为了提高回收效率,在政府对制造商的回收行为进行干涉下建立了制造商回收、零售商回收和混合回收决策模型,分别从消费者、政府、制造商、零售商和供应链整体五个角度研究了回收渠道的选择策略。结果表明,零售商总是希望参与回收;从其他四个角度来看,回收渠道选择主要受回收渠道竞争强度的影响,政府干涉对渠道选择影响不大。In order to improve the recovery efficiency, recycling channel selection of closed-loop supply chain under government intervention is studied. Closed-loop supply chain decision models are established under single recycling channel (the manufacturer), single recycling channel (the retailer) and mixed recycling channel. Then strategies for choosing recycling channel are studied respectively from the perspectives of consumers, the government, the manufacturer, the retailer and the whole supply chain. The re- sults show that the retailer always wants to participate in recycling and that from the other four perspec- tives, with recycling channel selection mainly affected by recycling competing intensity, government inter- vention has little effect on recycling channel selection. The results can be used as a reference for the gov- ernment's environmental policy and macro-control policy, recycling channel selection for the members of the closed-loop supply chain and consumers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112