波音与空客客机驾驶舱防操作错误设计对比研究  

A Comparative Research of Boeing and Airbus Cockpit Error Proofing Design

作　　者：孙瑞山[1] 赵康[1] 罗婷婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国民航大学民航安全科学研究所国家空管运行安全技术重点实验室,天津300300

出　　处：《工业工程》2015年第3期119-126,共8页Industrial Engineering Journal

基　　金：国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助项目(2010CB734105)

摘　　要：民用飞机驾驶舱操纵器件的防操作错误设计是驾驶舱人机工程的设计目标之一。本文基于防操作错误设计措施,采用调查表调研的方式,对比研究波音公司与空客公司在客机驾驶舱操纵器件中采用的防操作错误设计措施,对防操作错误设计措施的评估分为安全帮助度与频率两个方面,通过方差分析,研究波音飞机与空客飞机有差异的防操作错误设计措施,分析差异原因,对同一防操作错误设计措施,比较年龄、驾龄、技术等级等不同因素对其效果的影响,结果表明波音客机的设计操纵性优良,空客客机的设计更加注重逻辑保护,对不同的操纵器件,随着飞行员驾龄、年龄的增长,出错的频率及其安全帮助度展现出不同的变化趋势,文章为驾驶舱的防操作错误研究提供一定的参考。Error proofing design for controls in aircraft cockpit is one of the design goals of ergonomics. Based on error proofing design methods, the differences and similarities between Boeing and Airbus aircraft are studied by analyzing questionnaire data. By analysis of variance, the reasons for the different efforts of error proofing design methods between Boeing and Airbus aircraft are further studied. The analysis is divid- ed into two parts ： the degree of security support and the rate of recurrence. The effects of age, driving ex- perience, technician grade on the same error proofing method are considered. The result shows that Boeing design has a superior maneuverability and Airbus design stresses on logical protection. With the growing of age and driving experience, the frequency of operating error has different trend for different controls. The research provides a reference for the study of error proofing methods in the cockpit.

关 键 词：人机工程 操作错误 安全帮助度 频率 方差分析 

分 类 号：X949[环境科学与工程—安全科学]