检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘汉立[1] 郑宏[1] 郑炜[1] 富学林[1] 李作兴[1]
机构地区:[1]桂林医学院附属医院急诊科,广西桂林541001
出 处:《华夏医学》2015年第3期5-8,共4页Acta Medicinae Sinica
摘 要:目的:观察心肺复苏机对心脏骤停患者胸外心脏按压效果及复苏成功率。方法:65例使用萨勃心肺复苏机的患者为观察组,70例采用人工胸外按压心肺复苏的患者为对照组,比较两组患者的平均动脉压、心跳恢复时间、心肺复苏成功率及患者骨折发生率。结果:萨勃心肺复苏机组临床效果优于人工按压组,复苏成功率较人工按压组高,而骨折发生率较人工按压组低,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:萨勃心肺复苏机心肺复苏效果和成功率要优于传统人工心肺复苏。Objective:To investigate the clinical effect and the success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) in cardiac arrest patients using Thumper cardiopulmonary resuscitation device.Methods:65 patients rescued with Thumper CPR device chest compressions fell into the observation group,while another 70 cardiac arrest patients with manual chest compressions were selected as the control group,and both groups were compared with mean arterial pressure and heart rate recovery times during resuscitation,and also compared their success rates and rib fracture incidence.Results:The clinical effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group.The success rate of the observation group,which received Thumper CPR device method was higher than that of the control group,while the rib fracture incidence was lower than that of the control group.The difference between the two groups was significant statistically(P〈0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect and the success rate of Thumper cardiopulmonary resuscitation device is better than that of the traditional manual chest compressions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42