检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江大学学报(理学版)》2015年第4期483-488,共6页Journal of Zhejiang University(Science Edition)
基 金:陕西省教育厅人文社科研究计划项目(12JK0030)
摘 要:采用问卷调查法,以西安城区416名老人(相对空巢166人,绝对空巢106人,非空巢144人)为研究对象,探讨城市空巢老人社会支持、应对方式与其主观幸福感的关系.通过描述性统计、单因素方差分析、Pearson相关分析、结构方程模型进行数据分析,得到:绝对空巢组社会支持和主观幸福感水平最低,更倾向于采取消极应对方式.主观支持、解决问题和退避对空巢老人的主观幸福感有直接预测作用(权重分别为0.245,0.230,-0.290),主观支持、客观支持、支持利用度对空巢老人的主观幸福感有间接预测作用(权重分别为-0.035,0.101和0.113),客观支持和支持利用度仅通过应对方式对其主观幸福感产生间接影响,消极应对方式对主观幸福感的影响大于积极应对方式.By using questionnaire,416(including 166 relative empty-nest,106 absolute empty-nest and 144not-empty-nest elders)elderly people living in Xi'an urban area were selected as the subjects to investigate the relationship between the social support,coping style and subjective well-being(SWB)of the empty-nest elders living in urban area.The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics,one-way ANOVA,Pearson correlation analysis and structural equation modeling.we obtained the following results:the absolute empty-nest group scored the lowest level of social support and SWB,and were more inclined to adopt negative coping styles.For the empty-nest group,the social support,settling problem and the avoidance coping style had a direct effect on the subjective well-being(weights were 0.245,0.230,-0.290,respectively).Subjective support,objective support and support utilization could indirectly predict subjective well-being(weights were-0.035,0.101,0.113respectively).Objective support and support utilization had only an indirect effect on subjective well-being through coping styles.The effect of the negative coping style on subjective well-being was stronger than the positive coping style.
关 键 词:主观幸福感 社会支持 应对方式 空巢老人 结构方程模型
分 类 号:B844.4[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28