通向语言的本质:索绪尔与胡塞尔语言哲学比较研究  

Ways to Language per se: A Comparative Study of Saussurean and Husserlean Philosophies of Language

作　　者：谢刚[1,2] 吕明臣[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,吉林长春130062 [2]吉林大学公共外语教育学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第4期429-435,共7页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：吉林省社会科学基金资助项目(2015BS63);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2014QY038)

摘　　要：对语言本质的思考是20世纪初以来哲学的核心议题之一。对语言本质的探究是主体认识论向纵深发展的重要表现形式,是揭示语言形而下规律的必由之路。综览各哲学流派的本质观,现象学与结构主义在语言本质的认识上存在一定的共鸣,这些相似性体现在对语言本质理解的认识论和方法论上:认识论上表现为对经验主义和历史主义的批判;方法论上体现在对经验实在和历史实在的"悬搁"。索绪尔的心理主义立场决定了其对经验与历史实在"悬搁"的不彻底性,也预示着现象学在语言本质认识上对结构主义的超越。Reflection on language per se has become one of the central issues of philosophical pursuit since the beginning of 20th century. A probe into the intrinsic qualities of language is both the embodiment of in-depth development of subjective epistemology and the only way to reveal the formal regularities of language. Comparatively speaking, phenomenology bears more resemblance to structuralism in terms of the epistemology and methodology of language per se in that epistemology tends to criticize empiricism and historicism and methodology prefers the epoche of empirical and historical facts. However, the psychologism of Ferdinand de Saussure implies his incompleteness in dealing with empirical facts and the transcendence of phenomenology over structuralism in revealing the intrinsic qualities of language.

关 键 词：语言本质 索绪尔 胡塞尔 方法论 认识论 

分 类 号：H0-06[语言文字—语言学]