城市交通权之国家义务  

State's obligations of the right to urban traffic

作　　者：周忠学[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第4期120-129,共10页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"现代城市交通发展的制度平台与法律保障机制研究"(11&ZD160)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：城市化的日益加剧,城市交通权既是重要的理论热点,也是重大的实践问题。令人遗憾的是,法学界对此并没有有力的回应,更遑论城市交通权的国家义务了。城市交通权的国家义务因城市交通的公共本性而存内在依据,因国家义务的职能而据外在基础,因平等理念而享价值逻辑。从城市交通权有效保障的视角来看,城市交通权国家义务的内容建构与救济机制是其实现的关键性因素,前者内涵为尊重义务、保护义务与给付义务等3个主要方面,后者则为国家义务机关的自行纠错、公民监督权的行使和公力救济等3种重要途径。The right to urban traffic in the quickened process of urbanization is not only a hot theo- retic issue, but also a practical one. It is a pity that there has been no convincing response to the right to urban traffic, not to mention the state＇s obligations of right to urban traffic. Such obligations have the public nature of the urban traffic as the inherent foundation and their functions as the external ba- sis with the concept of equality as the value logic. From the perspective of fully performing the right to urban traffic, the construction of the contents and the remedy mechanism of the state＇s obligations are key factors. The former mainly includes three aspects which are the obligations for respect, pro- tection and payment respectively. While the latter consists of the self-correction by the government organs, the civil rights to supervision and public remedies.

关 键 词：城市交通权 国家义务 履行不能 救济机制 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]