检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董科[1] 傅健飞[2] 楼菁菁 刘江[1] 傅健飞
机构地区:[1]金华市中心医院核医学科,浙江金华321000 [2]金华市中心医院核医学科,321000
出 处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2015年第7期465-468,共4页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的:探讨分子影像SPECT/CT对乳腺癌骨转移的临床应用价值。方法 :回顾性分析多层螺旋CT与SPECT/CT融合显像对68个疑似乳腺癌骨转移病灶的检查结果,进行统计学检验。结果:经临床确诊乳腺癌骨转移的55个病灶中:MSCT诊断的敏感度为78.2%(43/55),特异性为92.3%(12/13),准确性为80.9%(55/68);SPECT/CT融合显像诊断敏感度为96.4%(53/55),特异性为76.9%(10/13),准确性为92.6%(63/68)。2种检查方法的敏感度、准确性差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),特异性差异无统计意义。结论:SPECT/CT融合显像相对于MSCT检查,可提高对乳腺癌骨转移的诊断敏感性和准确性,具有较好的临床应用价值。Objective: To investigate the clinical application value of the molecular imaging SPECT/CT for bone metastases of breast cancer. Methods: Both MSCT and SPECT/CT imaging data of 68 suspicious bone metastases lesions of breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed and compared, and the statistics checkout was carried out. Resluts: Among the 55 bone metas- tases lesions of breast cancer, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bone metastases diagnosed by MSCT were 78.2%(43/55), 92.3%(12/13) and 80.9%(55/68); and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bone metastases diagnosed by SPECT/CT were 96.4%(53/55), 76.9%(10/13) and 92.6%(63/68). For the difference of the sensitivity and accuracy, there was statistically signifi- cance between MSCT and SPECT methods(P〈0.05), and the specificity of both methods was no difference. Conclusions: Com- paring with MSCT, the SPECT/CT fusion imaging can improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the bone metastases diagnosis of breast cancer, and having better clinical application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30