分子影像SPECT/CT对乳腺癌骨转移的临床应用价值  被引量:15

The clinical application value of molecular imaging SPECT/CT for bone metastases from breast cancer

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:董科[1] 傅健飞[2] 楼菁菁 刘江[1] 傅健飞 

机构地区:[1]金华市中心医院核医学科,浙江金华321000 [2]金华市中心医院核医学科,321000

出  处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2015年第7期465-468,共4页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging

摘  要:目的:探讨分子影像SPECT/CT对乳腺癌骨转移的临床应用价值。方法 :回顾性分析多层螺旋CT与SPECT/CT融合显像对68个疑似乳腺癌骨转移病灶的检查结果,进行统计学检验。结果:经临床确诊乳腺癌骨转移的55个病灶中:MSCT诊断的敏感度为78.2%(43/55),特异性为92.3%(12/13),准确性为80.9%(55/68);SPECT/CT融合显像诊断敏感度为96.4%(53/55),特异性为76.9%(10/13),准确性为92.6%(63/68)。2种检查方法的敏感度、准确性差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),特异性差异无统计意义。结论:SPECT/CT融合显像相对于MSCT检查,可提高对乳腺癌骨转移的诊断敏感性和准确性,具有较好的临床应用价值。Objective: To investigate the clinical application value of the molecular imaging SPECT/CT for bone metastases of breast cancer. Methods: Both MSCT and SPECT/CT imaging data of 68 suspicious bone metastases lesions of breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed and compared, and the statistics checkout was carried out. Resluts: Among the 55 bone metas- tases lesions of breast cancer, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bone metastases diagnosed by MSCT were 78.2%(43/55), 92.3%(12/13) and 80.9%(55/68); and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bone metastases diagnosed by SPECT/CT were 96.4%(53/55), 76.9%(10/13) and 92.6%(63/68). For the difference of the sensitivity and accuracy, there was statistically signifi- cance between MSCT and SPECT methods(P〈0.05), and the specificity of both methods was no difference. Conclusions: Com- paring with MSCT, the SPECT/CT fusion imaging can improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the bone metastases diagnosis of breast cancer, and having better clinical application value.

关 键 词:乳腺肿瘤 肿瘤转移 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 单光子 

分 类 号:R737.9[医药卫生—肿瘤] R814.42[医药卫生—临床医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象