检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王鑫[1] 赵晓智[2] 吉鑫[2] 蒋银锋[2] 李笑弓[2] 甘卫东[2] 张古田[2] 张士伟[2] 郭宏骞[2]
机构地区:[1]东南大学医学院,江苏南京210009 [2]南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院泌尿外科,江苏南京210008
出 处:《现代泌尿外科杂志》2015年第7期460-463,共4页Journal of Modern Urology
摘 要:目的探讨帕多瓦(PADUA)评分是否能预测腹腔镜肾肿瘤射频消融术(LRFA)并发症发生的风险,根据LRFA本身的特点,改良PADUA评分系统,使其能够更好地预测LRFA的手术风险。方法回顾性分析160例单病灶肾肿瘤腹腔镜射频消融患者的临床资料,根据其术前CT进行标准的PADUA评分和改良PADUA评分(m-PADUA),分析这两种评分与手术并发症的相关性。结果标准的PADUA评分与LRFA并发症风险无明显相关性(P=0.307),而改良的PADUA评分与之有明显相关性(P=0.016)。结论标准的PADUA评分不适用于LRFA风险的预测,而改良评分能较好地预测LRFA手术风险。Objective To investigate whether the standard PADUA Nephrometry Score can predict complications after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation(LRFA),and to explore whether the modified PADUA score system(m-PADUA)is able to predict the risks.Methods Clinical data of 160 cases undergone single lesion LRFA were retrospectively analyzed.The preoperative CTResults were evaluated with the 2 systems,and then the correlation between the two scores and surgical complications were assessed.Results The standard PADUA Nephrometry Score had no obvious correlation with risk of complications(P=0.307),but the modified PADUA score had a significant correlation(P=0.016).Conclusions LRFA is a safe and effective treatment.The standard PADUA Nephrometry Score does not apply to LRFA risk prediction,while our modified score system can better predict LRFA operation risks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3