检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:寸金芝[1]
出 处:《临床心身疾病杂志》2015年第4期165-166,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
摘 要:目的探讨护理干预对无抽搐电休克治疗患者术前准备的影响。方法将300例需接受无抽搐电休克治疗的患者随机分为研究组和对照组各150例,对照组采用常规护理,研究组在对照组的基础上采用护理干预措施。术前评估两组患者准备情况,比较两组患者术前准备合格率。结果两组体温、血压、体质量测量情况,禁食禁饮情况得分比较差异无显著性(P〉0.05),其余各项研究组得分均显著高于对照组(P〈0.05或0.01)。研究组合格率为96.7%,对照组为90.7%,研究组显著高于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论采用护理干预措施能显著提高无抽搐电休克治疗患者术前准备的合格率,确保治疗顺利进行。Objective To explore the effects of nursing intervention on preoperotive preparation for patients undergoing modified electric convulsive therapy (MECT). Methods A total of 300 patients undergoing MECT were randomly assigned to research and control group of 150 ones each, control group received routine nursing and research group did nursing intervention measures on the basis of control group. Preparations were assessed between two groups before operation and quality rates of preoperotive preparation compared. Results There were no significant group differences in body temperature, BP, body weight as well as fasting and water-deprivation score (P〉0.05), the others' scores were significantly higher in research than in control group (P〈0.05 or 0.01). Quality rate was respectively 96.7% in research and 90. 7% in control group, the former was significantly higher than the latter (P〈0.05). Conclusion Nursing interventions could notably improve the quality rate of preoperotive preparation for patients undergoing MECT and ensure treatment smoothly.
分 类 号:R749.054[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229