困境与突破:我国亲属拒证权制度反思  

Some Reflections on Privilege of Relative Witness

作　　者：谢登科[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2015年第4期107-114,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(11BFX111)"刑事诉讼证明模式研究";司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(362132021407)"非法证据排除规则实施性规则研究";吉林大学廉政建设专项研究课题(2014LZY017)"纪检监察与刑事司法衔接机制研究"阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国刑事诉讼法创设亲属拒证权"出庭豁免"模式,宣示了人伦亲情普世价值的回归,立足于权利本位赋予亲属证人出庭选择权。但该制度存在目的与手段、权利与权利、形式与实质的悖论,给实践带来诸多困境。域外立法普遍采取亲属拒证权"证言豁免"模式,实现了程序正义与人伦亲情的统一。有必要放弃"出庭豁免"模式,从体系定位、主体范围、实质内容、程序保障等方面重构亲属拒证权。To protect family relations and trust with priority is the rationalization of relative witness＇privilege. There are two models of witness＂ privilege , i. e. , including testimonial privilege and testimonial privilege. Modified Criminal Proce- dure Code has created relative witness＇testimonial privilege. It＇s conducive to find facts. However, it not only disobeys the foundation of privilege of relative witness and family relations and trust, but also violates due process. Therefore, it is nec- essary to restructure witness~ privilege system from the position in system, subject of rights, substantive content and proce- dure protect.

关 键 词：亲属拒证权 出庭豁免 证言豁免 人伦亲情 

分 类 号：D925.03[政治法律—诉讼法学]