转基因食品标签的消费者知情权比较研究  被引量:8

A Comparative Study on the Consumer's Right to Know as to the Genetically Modified Food(GMF) Labeling

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郭桂环[1,2] 

机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]河北师范大学法政学院

出  处:《北方法学》2015年第4期105-112,共8页Northern Legal Science

摘  要:各国对转基因食品实施了不同的标签制度:强制标签与自愿标签。这两种标签制度分别建立在消费者需要知情和消费者有权知情的法理基础之上。需要知情是以产品为基础,确保消费者对客观真实的风险知情;而有权知情往往以生产过程和生产方法为基础,以风险预防为原则管理风险以减少消费者的感知风险。一个国家采取何种转基因食品标签制度,受到该国经济、文化和政治方面的影响。我国转基因食品标签立法在即,需要借鉴其他国家的立法经验,因地制宜地实施强制标签制度,以保障消费者知情权的实现。There are two GMF labeling systems on the international level: mandatory labeling and voluntary labeling,which are respectively based on two legal grounds as need to know and have the right to know.The need to know is product based,which ensures the consumer to know the actual risk inherent in the product; while the right to know is based on the process and producing method by managing the risk for prevention so as to reduce the consumer's perceived risk. Since the choice of GMF labeling system is influenced by the country's economy,politics and culture,as to our country,it is suggested that by taking reference from other countries,the legislation on GMF labeling legislation should implement the mandatory labeling for the purpose of ensuring the consumer's right to know.

关 键 词:转基因食品 自愿标签 强制标签 风险预防原则 

分 类 号:D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象