检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学工商管理学院,杭州310018 [2]浙江理工大学心理系,杭州310018
出 处:《应用心理学》2015年第1期68-75,共8页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:杭州市科技情报调研项目(20141334M260)
摘 要:本研究在对移动电子商务比较调查问卷(MCCS)进行中文修订并考察其信度和效度的基础上,对国内大学生用户基于传统PC和移动终端在线购物易用性水平感知进行了比较。结果表明,修订后的MCCS问卷具有较高的信度和效度;基于传统PC和移动终端在线购物在易用性方面的优势不同,前者更多地集中在界面显示和复杂操作等便利性方面,而后者主要在于在线购物的时间地点自由性方面。因此,基于移动终端的在线购物应该是基于PC的重要补充,而不是完全能替代其作用。The present study mainly compared the consumer usability experience differences between PC and mobile commerce in consumer shopping, based on the revision of the Mobile Commerce Comparison Survey (MCCS) . Results showed that the revised Chinese Version of the MCCS had good reliability and validity. On the one hand, shoppers found m-commerce more preferable to e-commerce in shopping from every wished location or time. In the aspects of overall shopping convenience, there existed a significant superiority of e-commerce. However, in the aspects of other items such as shopping for a large product variety no significant difference was fotmd between ecommerce and m-commerce. Therefore, the usability predominance of m-commerce and e-commerce was different and m-commerce can be a shopping medium complementary to the classic e-commerce rather than a direct alternative to it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166