检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《价值工程》2015年第25期45-47,共3页Value Engineering
摘 要:本文结合BCC-DEA和NEW-COST-DEA两种方法对我国上市仓储企业成本效率进行了分析,分析结果显示在做成本效率分析时NEW-COST-DEA方法明显优于BCC-DEA方法,通过分析发现国内仓储企业成本效率总体水平不理想,而且企业之间差距较大,在以后的发展中应该注意利用科学与管理技术的革新来提高企业成本、技术和配置效率。BCC-DEA and NEW-COST-DEA method were used to analyze the cost efficiency of storage enterprises listed in China.The result has indicated that NEW-COST-DEA is superior to BCC-DEA while do analysis of cost efficiency,the truth,the total level of the Chinese storage enterprises' cost efficiency is lowly,was manifest in it.There is great gap between each storage enterprise.In order to improve enterprises' cost,technology and allocation efficiency,those enterprises should pay more attention to take advantage of the innovation of science and management technology in the future development.
关 键 词:仓储企业 成本效率 NEW-COST-DEA BCC-DEA
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222