检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆海凤[1] 柳勇[1] 钟井松[1] 马林[1] 周昌冬 林千早
机构地区:[1]淮安市第二人民医院影像科,江苏淮安223002
出 处:《南昌大学学报(医学版)》2015年第3期66-68,71,共4页Journal of Nanchang University:Medical Sciences
摘 要:目的探讨脊柱高分辨率CT及MRI成像诊断脊柱转移瘤临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析32例经病理及临床证实为脊柱转移瘤患者的脊柱高分辨率CT及MRI成像影像学表现,比较2种检查方法在诊断脊柱转移瘤中的临床应用价值。结果MRI对脊柱转移瘤的检出率为93.0%,明显高于高分辨率CT检出率的80.6%(P<0.05);MRI对于溶骨性骨质破坏、累及附件、病理性压缩骨折及椎旁软组织受累情况的诊断均优于高分辨率CT(均P<0.05);2种检查方法对成骨性骨质破坏、混合性骨质破坏及椎管狭窄诊断比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 MRI、高分辨率CT对脊柱转移瘤的诊断各有优势,但MRI在发现早期病变、病理性压缩性骨折、附件及软组织受累等方面较有优势。Objective To evaluate the clinical application of high-resolution CT and MRI in the diagnosis of spinal metastases.Methods High-resolution CT and MRI findings of 32 patients with pathologically and clinically confirmed spinal metastases were analyzed retrospectively.The clinical values of the two methods in the diagnosis of spinal metastases were compared.Results MRI showed a higher detection rate of spinal metastases than high-resolution CT (93.0% vs 80.6%,P 0.05). Conclusion The MRI and high-resolution CT have their own respective advantages in the diagno-sis of spinal metastases.However,MRI is superior to high-resolution CT for detecting early le-sions,pathologic compression fractures,accessory involvement and paraspinal soft tissue involve-ment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30