中韩港口经营人责任限制制度比较研究  

Comparative Study of the Legal System of Terminal Operators' Limitation of Liability under Chinese Law and Korean Law

作　　者：马炎秋[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学法政学院,山东青岛266100

出　　处：《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期116-119,共4页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究一般项目:"中韩第三方物流民事责任比较研究--以中韩‘4+1’港口战略联盟下港口物流发展及立法完善为视角"(12CFXJ06);青岛市双百调研工程项目:"中韩‘4+1’港口战略联盟下青岛港口物流发展及法律对策研究"(2011-B-24)

摘　　要：港口经营人能否限制赔偿责任取决于其法律地位的正确界定。文章从承运人责任限制的立法依据入手,比较分析中、韩法下港口经营人的法律地位以及法院对提单背面的港口经营人责任限制条款的效力的态度,认为港口经营人应为独立合同人,其不能直接根据《海商法》享有责任限制的权利,但司法实践中应认定提单背面的港口经营人责任限制条款有效。Whether the terminal operator is entitled to the limitation of liability by the carrier depends on the de‐termination of its legal status .This paper ,starting with an analysis of the legislative provisions with respect to carriers’ limitation of liability ,makes a comparative study of the legal status of the terminal operator and the judicial attitude towards the validity of the “Himalaya Clause”in China and Korea .It is concluded that the ter‐minal operator is an independent contractor and therefore cannot directly enjoy the benefits of the carrier ’s limi‐tation of liability .However ,where terminal operator’s limitation of liability is included in the “Himalaya Clause”,such inclusion is valid .

关 键 词：港口经营人 独立合同人 法律地位 责任限制 喜马拉雅条款 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]