机构地区:[1]汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院广东省乳腺癌诊治研究重点实验室,广东汕头515041 [2]汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院中心实验室,广东汕头515041
出 处:《中华肿瘤防治杂志》2015年第13期1014-1018,共5页Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基 金:广东省自然科学基金面上项目(S2013010015969);广东省医学科研基金(B2012261);汕头市医疗重点科技计划(汕府科[2012]113号);汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院内青年基金(汕大医肿瘤医[2014]10)
摘 要:目的分析雌激素受体(estrogenreceptor,ER)阳性乳腺癌组织PIMT蛋白的表达及其与临床病理指标和预后的关系。方法收集汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院2001—10—16—2002—12—30接受治疗的女性乳腺癌患者117例,ER表达均为阳性。利用免疫组织化学技术检测乳腺癌标本中PIMT蛋白的表达,采用Y。检验分析其与临床病理特征的关系,采用z检验、Kaplan—Meier法和Cox回归模型分析PIMT蛋白表达对预后的影响。结果PIMT蛋白主要定位在细胞质,117例ER阳性乳腺癌组织PIMT蛋白的高表达率为36.8%(43/117),其表达与患者的年龄(X2^=0.444,P=0.505)、肿瘤大小(X2^=0.545,P=0.461)、淋巴结转移(X2^=0.005,P=0.942)、临床分期(X2^=0.073,P=0.787)、PR(X2^=1.483,P=0.223)和HER-2(X2^=0.780,P=0.377)表达均无关;与随访结局有关,X2^=4.194,P=0.041;PIMT低表达和高表达的患者10年的生存率分别为51.8%和79.4%,差异有统计学意义,X2^=-3.229,P=0.001;两组总体生存曲线差异有统计学意义,X2^=3.999,Log—RankP=0.046。Cox回归分析提示,临床分期(HR:8.526,95%CI:2.568~28.300,Wald X2^=12.257,P〈0.001)和PIMT是ER阳性乳腺癌患者独立的预后因素(HR:0.403,95%CI:0.172~0.945,Wald X2^=4.371,P=0.037)。结论PIMT在乳腺癌进展中发挥重要作用,可作为临床上ER阳性乳腺癌一个新的预后指标,可能与内分泌治疗耐药有关。OBJECTIVE To study the PIMT protein expression and its relationship with clinicopathological param- eters, and its influence on the prognosis of human ER-positive breast cancer. METHODS We collected tumor tissues from 117 female patients with ER-positive breast cancer treated at the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical Col- lege from October 2001 to November 2002. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect the protein expression of PIMT in breast tumors, and ehi-square test was used to study the relationship between the PIMT expression and clinico pathological parameters. The z test, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were conducted to study the influ- ence of PIMT on the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer. RESULTS PIMT protein was expressed primarily in the cytoplasm. The high expression rate of PIMT in 117 ER-positive breast tumors was 36.8 % (43/117), and the PIMT ex- pression was correlated to survival(x2 =4. 194,P=0. 041) ,but not age (X2^ =0. 444, P=0. 505), tumor size (X2^ =0. 545, P=0. 461), Lymph node metastasis (X2^ =0. 005, P=0. 942), clinical stages (X2^ =0. 073, P=0. 787), PR (X2 =1. 483, P= 0. 223) and HER-2 expression (Xe = 0. 780, P=0. 377). The overall 10-years survival rates were significantly differ- ent between the low PIMT expression group and the high PIMT expression group (51.8% vs 79.4%, z= -3. 229,P=0. 001), and the survival curves in these two groups were significantly different (2 = 3. 999, Log Rank P= 0. 046). Cox regression model demonstrated that clinical stages (HR: 8. 526,95 ;CI: 2. 568- 28. 300 ,Wald 3(2 = I2. 257, P〈0. 001) and PIMT (HR : 0. 403,95 % CI : 0. 172- 0. 945, Wald :(z = 4. 371, P = 0. 037) were the independent prognostic factors for ER-positive breast cancer. CONCLUSION PIMT plays an important role in the progression of breast cancer and could he a novel prognostic factor for ER-positive breast cancer, which probably relates to the anti-estrogen therapies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...