Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging  

作　　者：Ying Ding Sheng-Xiang Rao Cai-Zhong Chen Ren-Chen Li Meng-Su Zeng 

机构地区：[1]Department of Radiology,Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging

出　　处：《World Journal of Gastroenterology》2015年第16期5017-5022,共6页世界胃肠病学杂志（英文版）

基　　金：Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81371543

摘　　要：AIM:To compare differences between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination(VIBE) using two-point Dixon fat-water separation(Dixon-VIBE) and chemically selective fat saturation(FS-VIBE) with magnetic resonance imaging examination.METHODS:Forty-nine patients were included, who were scanned with two VIBE sequences(Dixon-VIBE and FS-VIBE) in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration.Subjective evaluations including sharpness of tumor, sharpness of vessels, strength and homogeneity of fat suppression, and artifacts that were scored using a 4-point scale.The liver-to-lesion contrast was also calculated and compared.RESULTS:Dixon-VIBE with water reconstruction had significantly higher subjective scores than FS-VIBE in strength and homogeneity of fat suppression(< 0.0001) but lower scores in sharpness of tumor(P < 0.0001), sharpness of vessels(P = 0.0001), and artifacts(P = 0.034).The liver-to-lesion contrast on Dixon-VIBE images was significantly lower than that on FS-VIBE(16.6% ± 9.4% vs 23.9% ± 12.1%, P = 0.0001).CONCLUSION:Dixon-VIBE provides stronger and more homogenous fat suppression than FS-VIBE, while has lower clarity of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration.AIM:To compare differences between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination(VIBE) using two-point Dixon fat-water separation(Dixon-VIBE) and chemically selective fat saturation(FS-VIBE) with magnetic resonance imaging examination.METHODS:Forty-nine patients were included, who were scanned with two VIBE sequences(Dixon-VIBE and FS-VIBE) in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration.Subjective evaluations including sharpness of tumor, sharpness of vessels, strength and homogeneity of fat suppression, and artifacts that were scored using a 4-point scale.The liver-to-lesion contrast was also calculated and compared.RESULTS:Dixon-VIBE with water reconstruction had significantly higher subjective scores than FS-VIBE in strength and homogeneity of fat suppression(< 0.0001) but lower scores in sharpness of tumor(P < 0.0001), sharpness of vessels(P = 0.0001), and artifacts(P = 0.034).The liver-to-lesion contrast on Dixon-VIBE images was significantly lower than that on FS-VIBE(16.6% ± 9.4% vs 23.9% ± 12.1%, P = 0.0001).CONCLUSION:Dixon-VIBE provides stronger and more homogenous fat suppression than FS-VIBE, while has lower clarity of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration.

关 键 词：Dixon-volumetric interpolated breath-holdexamination FAT saturation-volumetric interpolatedbreath-hold EXAMINATION Gadoxetic acid Volumetricinterpolated BREATH-HOLD EXAMINATION Magnetic resonance imaging 

分 类 号：R575[医药卫生—消化系统] R445.2[医药卫生—内科学]