标准文献的被引证特征及其老化研究  

Analysis of Cited Features and Obsolescence of Standard Documents

作　　者：杨思洛[1] 关影[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学公共管理学院,湘潭411105

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2015年第11期106-110,142,共6页Library and Information Service

基　　金：全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目"网络环境下学者合著与引证行为规律研究"(项目编号:2014094)研究成果之一

摘　　要：[目的/意义]为了解我国标准文献的学术影响力,以为标准文献的利用提供参考,从标准文献的角度出发,分析其被引证特征。[方法/过程]选择中国引文数据库中1994-2013年标准类引文数据,采用文献计量的方法,从标准引文总量、篇均标准引文量等方面分析标准文献的总体被引用情况和学科分布情况。[结果/结论]标准引文量和篇均标准引文量占引文总量比例很小;各学科标准引文量差异较大,工科和医科对标准文献的引用较多;标准引文数量和被引频次较高的专题集中于自然科学;大部分社会学科标准引用量为零;标准引文的半衰期整体上较长,老化速度较慢。[ Purpose/significance ] In order to realize the academic influence of standard documents in China and provide reference for the use of standard documents, this paper analyzes the cited characteristics of standard documents. [ Method/process] By applying bibliometrics methods, choosing the data of standard citations of 1994 to 2013, this paper makes an analysis about the standard citations and the subject distribution from the indicators including the total citations and average citations. [ Result/conclusion ] It shows that the percentage of standard citation and average citation in the to- tal citations are very small; the standard citations of each subject are quite different, and the citations in engineering and medical science are the biggest; the high-cited standard citations belongs to natural science ; the standard citations is zero in most social science; the half-life of standard citations is long and the obsolescence speed is slow.

关 键 词：标准 引文分析 学科差异 半衰期 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]