检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王丽娜[1] 瑞云[1] 周郁秋[2] 刘秀娟[1] 苏红[2]
机构地区:[1]内蒙古赤峰学院医学院护理系,赤峰024000 [2]哈尔滨医科大学大庆校区护理学院
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2015年第7期644-646,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13CRK009)
摘 要:目的探讨应对方式在城市空巢老人希望水平对主观幸福感影响过程中的中介效应。方法采用Herth希望量表、应对方式问卷及纽芬兰纪念大学幸福度量表,对内蒙赤峰地区208名城市空巢老人进行调查,运用结构方程模型探讨希望水平、应对方式对主观幸福感的影响途径。结果希望水平对城市空巢老人主观幸福感的影响符合完全中介模型(χ2/df=1.971,GFI=0.955,AGFI=0.911,RMSEA=0.068),积极应对方式的中介效应显著(Z=3.692,P〈0.01),中介贡献率为41.76%。结论希望水平借助积极应对方式提升城市空巢老人主观幸福感。Objective To explore the mediator effect of coping styles in relationship between hope level and subjective well-being of empty-nesters in urban community. Methods 208 empty-nesters were tested with Herth Hope Scale, Coping Style Questionnaire and Subjective Well-Being to investigate the influence and the path- ways of hope and coping styles on subjective well- being with structural equation modeling. Results Influence of hope level on subjective well-being of empty-nesters in urban community accorded with completely-mediated model (χ2/df= 1.971, GFI = 0.955, AGFI = 0.911, RMSEA = 0.068 ), and influence of hope level mediated by positive coping styles accounted for 41.76%(Z=3.692, P〈0.01). Conclusion The influence of hope level on subjective well-being is mediated mainly by positive coping styles for empty-nesters in urban community.
分 类 号:B844.4[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117