检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:路美玲[1,2] 王成[2] 胡继成[3] 陈熹[4] 张辰宇[4] 张春妮[2] 殷志敏[1]
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学生命科学院,南京210046 [2]南京军区南京总医院检验科,南京210002 [3]哈尔滨医科大学附属第五医院泌尿科,黑龙江大庆163000 [4]南京大学生命科学学院,医药生物技术国家重点实验室,南京210093
出 处:《临床检验杂志》2015年第6期417-419,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81472021);南京军区医学科技创新重点课题(12Z28);南京军区南京总医院科研课题(2014043)
摘 要:目的检测肾透明细胞癌患者血清miR-362水平,探讨其作为肾透明细胞癌分子诊断指标的可能性。方法采集107例肾透明细胞癌患者治疗前血清(其中TNMⅠ期76例、Ⅱ期16例、Ⅲ期2例、Ⅳ期8例及未知者5例),用实时荧光定量RTPCR法检测各组miR-362含量,并以107例年龄、性别匹配的健康人作为对照组。结果 miR-362在肾透明细胞癌患者血清中的相对含量为0.81(0.65,1.15),与健康对照组0.62(0.46,0.78)相比,表达水平明显升高(U=3 122,P〈0.01)。Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期和Ⅳ期患者血清miR-362的相对含量分别为0.76(0.66,0.95)、0.76(0.66,0.95)和0.69(0.37,1.03),均明显高于健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(U分别为2 197、474和98,P均〈0.01)。miR-362诊断肾透明细胞癌的ROC曲线下面积(AUCROC)为0.727(95%CI:0.661~0.793)。当cut off值为0.696时,miR-362诊断肾透明细胞癌的敏感性和特异性分别为64.5%和63.6%。进一步对TNMⅠ期患者进行分析,结果其AUCROC为0.715(95%CI:0.641~0.790)。当cut off值为0.696时,miR-362诊断TNMⅠ期患者的敏感性和特异性分别为65.3%和63.6%。结论早期肾透明细胞癌患者血清中miR-362水平升高,具有一定的早期诊断潜能。Objective To investigate the levels of serum miR-362 in the patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma( cc-RCC),and evaluate its potential as a molecular biomarker for the diagnosis of cc-RCC. Methods The serum samples from 107 patients with untreated cc-RCC,including 76 TNM stageⅠ,16 stage Ⅱ,2 stage Ⅲ,8 stage Ⅳ and 5 unknown stage,and 107 healthy controls with matched age and sex,were collected to detect the levels of miR-362 by real-time quantitative RT-PCR( qRT-PCR). Results The median levels[M( P25,P75) ]of serum miR-362 in the patients with cc-RCC were significantly higher than that in the controls[0. 81( 0. 65,1. 15) vs0. 62( 0. 46,0. 78),U = 3 122,P〈0. 01]. The relative level of miR-362 in serum from patients with only TNM stageⅠ,Ⅱ or Ⅳ was0. 76( 0. 66,0. 95),0. 76( 0. 66,0. 95) and 0. 69( 0. 37,1. 03),respectively,all being statistically markedly higher than controls [U was 2 197,474 and 98,respectively,P〈0. 01]. The area under the ROC curve( AUCROC) of miR-362 for the diagnosis of cc-RCC was0. 727( 95% CI: 0. 661-0. 793). When the cut off value was 0. 696,the sensitivity and specificity of miR-362 for the diagnosis of cc-RCC were 64. 5% and 63. 6%. Furthermore,AUC for TNM stageⅠ was 0. 715( 95% CI: 0. 641-0. 790). When the cut off value was 0. 696,the sensitivity and specificity of miR-362 for diagnosing TNM stageⅠ was 65. 3% and 63. 6%,respectively. Conclusion The increased serum miR-362 levels in cc-RCC patients indicate that miR-362 may be helpful for the diagnosis of cc-RCC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171