检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈子楠[1]
出 处:《法学杂志》2015年第8期132-140,共9页Law Science Magazine
基 金:中国法学会2014年度部级法学研究重点课题"完善人权司法保障制度研究"[课题编号:CLS(2014)B07]的阶段性成果
摘 要:刑事审前阶段中非法证据排除程序的合理程序架构对于保障犯罪嫌疑人合法权利具有十分重要的理论与实践意义。文章从实践、规范、理论三个维度解构当前审前阶段非法证据排除程序的主体混乱、程序空白、效力不足等问题,并在此基础上提出与比较了侦查机关内部排除和检察机关外部排除的异同,明确侦查阶段与审查起诉阶段非法证据排除的不同主体和与之相适应的书面审查和听证程序的不同构造,以及完善整合审前阶段非法取证实体性制裁和程序性制裁体系的可能进路。A reasonable institutional framework for the Exclusionary Rule in the pretrial stage of criminal procedure has both theoretical and practical meanings on protecting the legitimate rights of criminal suspects.There are still many problems remained in the current procedure for China' s exclusionary rule in investigation and prosecution proceedings from the perspective of judicial practice.It is necessary to deconstruct the current procedure of the exclusionary rule by practice,norm and theory dimensions,as well as to compare the different procedure forms of the investigation and prosecution departments,on the basis of which the possible approach to properly build the procedures for China' s exclusionary rule in pretrial proceedings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.165.245