文学、民族主义与文化领导权——政治文化视阈中文学的“民族形式”问题  

Literature,Nationalism and Cultural Leadership——The“National Form”Debate on Literature and Art from Perspective of Political Culture

作　　者：毕海[1] 

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学文学与新闻传播学院,北京100081

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2015年第4期146-151,共6页Qilu Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"‘50-70年代文学’与‘新时期文学’之关联研究"(08BZW057);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"中国当代文学之‘民族形式’研究"(2014MDWCXYQN04)

摘　　要："民族形式"是在抗日战争特殊形势下耦合而成的一个概念,以往学界往往将其与文学的"大众化"、"民族化"问题联系在一起。实际上,"民族形式"问题具有自己的意识形态背景和理论谱系,是毛泽东等共产党人在"民族主义"思潮兴起的背景下,为应对党外和党内的理论对手,获取文化领导权而提出的,是马克思主义者对晚清以来逐渐形成的中国社会民族主义正义伦理的合理发挥和有效利用。文艺的"民族形式"论争运动成为延安左翼思想界重新整合民族主义文化资源的重要途径,为建立新的国家政权提供了文化意识形态储备。“National form”was a concept formed in the unique situation during Anti-Japanese War.The academia usually connected it with literary issues such as “popularization”,“nationalization”.In fact,the issue of “national form”has its own i-deological background and theoretical system.It was a cultural campaign launched by Mao Zedong and other members of the Communist Party of China （CPC）to compete against rivals on theory both in and outside CPC and gain cultural leadership un-der the background of the emerging ideological trend of nationalism.It was a reasonable development and effective utilization of the righteous ethic of the Chinese society by Marxists formed gradually since the late Qing Dynasty.The “national form”debate and campaign on literature and art became an important way for Marxists in Yan’an then to reintegrate national cultural re-sources,and provided a cultural ideology for establishing new state power.

关 键 词：民族主义 民族形式 文化领导权 政党政治与文学 

分 类 号：I021[文学—文学理论]