检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马海峰[1,2] 关明山[1] 姚念民 岳新[1] 杜文杰[3] 战福瑞[3]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江科技大学计算机与信息工程学院,哈尔滨150027 [2]哈尔滨工程大学自动化学院,哈尔滨150001 [3]哈尔滨工程大学计算机科学技术与技术学院,哈尔滨150001
出 处:《计算机应用研究》2015年第9期2769-2773,2783,共6页Application Research of Computers
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅科学技术研究项目(12533052);国家自然科学基金资助项目(61073047)
摘 要:目前针对存储系统的攻击行为层出不穷,已出现多种存储器保护机制,但其大多是在处理器中加入计算部件,需较大空间存储校验数据,这不但增加了处理器负担,存储开销也很大。针对此问题进行了研究,依据协同认证的思想,提出一种附加硬件的内存完整性保护方法 MIPIC,其关键是在内存中加入一种具有计算功能的硬件部件,由处理器与该部件协同完成内存数据完整性校验。将MIPIC与CHTree比较,从存储增益等角度进行了性能分析,从认证方案性能等方面进行了实验模拟。分析和实验证明,MIPIC有更低的计算开销和存储开销。Recently, the attacks focus on computer storage system are emerging everywhere. Many memory protection mecha- nisms have been proposed, but most of them are joined calculating unit in the processor and need store verification data. These not only increase the computation burden of the processor, but also increase storage overhead. Begin to study for this problem, based on the idea of collaborative certification, this paper proposed a memory integrity protection method of append hardware called MIPIC. The key of the MIPIC was joining a hardware unit to the memory with calculating functions, thus the processor was collaborative with the unit to finish memory data verification. The MIPIC compared with the CHTree, performance analysis was made from the perspective of storage gain, etc. Simulations and experimental simulation were finished from the perspective of verification scheme performance, etc. The performance analysis and experiment show that the MIPIC has lower computation- al overhead and storage overhead.
分 类 号:TP309.1[自动化与计算机技术—计算机系统结构]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.116.193