检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川绵阳四O四医院——川北医学院附属第二医院胃镜室,四川绵阳621000
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2015年第17期32-33,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨结肠镜诊疗术前的最佳肠道准备方法,提高结肠镜诊疗效果。方法:将行结肠镜检查需要肠道准备的120例患者,随机分为A组、B组和C组各40例,A组肠道准备采用复方聚乙二醇电解质散,B组肠道准备采用甘露醇,C组肠道准备采用硫酸镁。观察并详细记录各组肠镜检查中肠道清洁程度,以及患者的耐受情况。结果:A组肠道清洁度有效率为90.D%,高于B组的75.0%和C组的70.0%;A组的耐受度为95.O%,高于B组的77.5%和C组的75.0%。A组与B组和C组比较,在清洁效果与病人耐受方面差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);B组与C组在清洁效果与耐受方面差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散的肠道准备效果满意,病人耐受好,能提高结肠镜诊疗效果。Objective: To study the most effective method of bowel preparation in the diagnosis and treatment of colonoscopy, and increase the success rate of colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 120 patients undergoing colonoseopy were randomly and equally divid- ed into groups A, B and C. They were given compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder( group A) , mannitol ( group B) , and magnesium sulfate ( group C ) as bowel preparation medication respectively. During the bowel preparation the effect of bowel preparation, patient compliance were observed and recorded in detail. Results: The effective rate of bowel cleanness in group A was 90.0% ,higher than 75.0% in group B and 70.0% in group C. The effective rate of patient compliance in group A was 95.0% , higher than 77.5% in group B and 75.0% in group C, There were no significant differences in the bowel cleanness and patient com- pliance between group B and group C ( P 〉 0.05 ), but there were significant differences comparing group A with group B and group C ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: The application of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in bowel preparation is effective, with good compliance and high colonoscopy success rate.
关 键 词:肠道准备 结肠镜检查 复方聚乙二醇电解质散 甘露醇 硫酸镁
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3